I succeeded and have now an operational KMY file (KeyMyMoney).
As recommended, during a whole week, I have cleaned the "<" & ">" from the "comments" of all involved operations in my GSB file (GRISBI).
I dont know if it was the real blocking problem, but it is sure that the updated operations contribute to clear up the QIF files (derived from my multiple accounts - about sisty).
Then I restarted to introduce the QIF files in a new KMY file.
I entered "slowly" the QIF files (= each account), saving the KMY file each time and geting out after 5 entrance, so that I could see if the blocking problem appeared again. Testing each time took more than two days...
With this procedure, I entered all the files (except one) without "paying attention" to the messages with problems to be solved (for a good KMY file), pop up messages appearing when I save the changed KMY file.
I have indeed met a first error, because when you enter a QIF file, the "main" account (involved) is correct, but all the accounts also concerned by the relevant transactions are supposed to start at the date of the creation of the major KMY file (01/02/2016 for me), so that the transactions are supposed to be BEFORE the creation of the account. When entering the new QIF file that matches the "wrong" account ("wrong" with wrong date of creation), the good date is included and corrects the concerned problems in the pop up messages.
Entering all the QIF files "at once" (progressively), I have the majority of the problems cleared away.
I have corrected the last account using "EDIT the account" and writing the appropriate date.
It is natural and normal that a file (the KMY file) have an "creation date" (in "file informations"). But, there should also have a "STARTING DATE", so that all QIF files from an existing software could be introduced and
have a correct "opening date", eliminating many and many problems.
This SHOULD be DONE, because yesterday, using the "totally correct" file, I started to enter new operations (so not transactions between account) and I have to created a new "CATEGORY" for a payment dated of the 27/01/2016. It was IMPOSSIBLE because it was "updated", so I was forced to enter the operation at the 01/02/2016, date of creation of the "new" KMY file (date automaticaly generated).
KMY file creation date dont have to be the reference for the operations and creation. If necessary "opening date" of the account can be a security reference. So "STARTING DATE" should be the best security reference.
Second problem matched is the correlation between two QIF files entered involving the same account.
In most cases, there is an excellent correlation between the transactions (between two accounts).
But, the good written operations have two additional lines, so that you can visually correlate the two entered operations. It is a good thing for security, but, to clean up the account, you have to ACCEPT each operation ; and it takes very long times when you have a big file with many and many transactions.
Possible improvement : I think that, after solving the eventual problems, you should be able to ACCEPT ALL the transactions at once.
But there is a "real" problem of correlation with two QIF files with accounts not in the same position with "RECONCILIATION" ("R" is reconciliation with a bank paper).
If you entered first the "NON RECONCILIATED" account (CASH account for example), no matter ; the correlation is goog in the second account (checking account for exemple) ; you have only to ACCEPT each transaction in this second account.
But, if you enter the "R" file first, you generate a second account with all over "R" operations... so that when you enter the "non R" QIF file, you have NO CORRELATION and all the transactions ("R"<>"non R") between the two accounts are DUPLICATED.
It is the reason why I have not entered my last QIF file, with "non R" transaction, generating to many problems...
For me, it is clear that the "CORRELATION" is not performing enough !
Thus, after entering QIF files, I had to check up all the operations in all the accounts to RECONCILIATE the right ones and to be able to make THE first reconciliation of all the accounts...
After three working weeks, I think my KMY file is now clean and all the accounts are right (with good figures), except the last one. I can finally work again !
Another little problems :
1/ the "RECCURENT operations" have disappeared. No QIF file is able to enter the operations. I have to do it manualy.
2/ when entering a "beneficiary", it seems the KMY software takes the first appearance of the name to propose the right informations for the new operations (option choosen). All the software I used before proposed the last appearance of the beneficiary. It seems that I have no choice (in "configuration"). Is this choice generated so because I entered QIF files ?
3/ I have not found the way to configurate the width of the columns , when an account is displayed in the "Great Book". The date is not totally visible and the FIGURES (in DEBIT, CREDIT and BALANCE) are limited to five visible numbers (for exemple 215,38 instead on 10215,38).
Kind regards
MGR
Le 04/02/2016 13:49, allan via KDE Bugzilla a écrit :

>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358579

>     allan <agander93@gmail.com> changed:

>                What    |Removed                     |Added
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  Status|CONFIRMED                   |RESOLVED
>              Resolution|---                         |WAITINGFORINFO

>     --- Comment #11 from allan <agander93@gmail.com> ---
>     (In reply to MGR from comment #9)
>     <snip>

> >     I will give you the result, when the whole correcting and entering work
> >     will be done.

>     <snip>

> >     MGR

>     (from aga)
>     Await above feedback.

>     With the '<' & '>' edited out, the two files do import correctly, and the
>     relevant transactions get matched correctly during import.

Cet e-mail a été envoyé depuis un ordinateur protégé par Avast. www.avast.com